“Stopping sending money for bombs and weapons to Netanyahu will increase the voter turnout”. If leadership cannot do this because it is the just and humane thing to do, maybe self interest in winning the election might motivate them? Why are these facts NOT getting to the Harris Walz campaign?
“Stopping sending money for bombs and weapons to Netanyahu will increase the voter turnout”. If leadership cannot do this because it is the just and humane thing to do, maybe self interest in winning the election might motivate them? Why are these facts NOT getting to the Harris Walz campaign?
“Stopping sending money for bombs and weapons to Netanyahu will increase the voter turnout”. If leadership cannot do this because it is the just and humane thing to do, maybe self interest in winning the election might motivate them? Why are these facts NOT getting to the Harris Walz campaign?