"Unsurprisingly, legacy media is notably absent on both to the detriment of all humanity." You're always talking about legacy media falling down on the job, and it's often well-deserved criticism. But I have absolutely heard reporting about the dire situation in Sudan and Congo from traditional sources, whereas this is the first time I've seen you mention it.
"Unsurprisingly, legacy media is notably absent on both to the detriment of all humanity." You're always talking about legacy media falling down on the job, and it's often well-deserved criticism. But I have absolutely heard reporting about the dire situation in Sudan and Congo from traditional sources, whereas this is the first time I've seen you mention it.
"Unsurprisingly, legacy media is notably absent on both to the detriment of all humanity." You're always talking about legacy media falling down on the job, and it's often well-deserved criticism. But I have absolutely heard reporting about the dire situation in Sudan and Congo from traditional sources, whereas this is the first time I've seen you mention it.
I've written about this several times before, and discussed it several times on my nationally broadcast SiriusXM show. And while you may have "seen media," I tend to believe the UN workers in Sudan telling us they're struggling to get media attention: https://www.unocha.org/news/un-relief-chief-tells-media-very-very-difficult-get-attention-sudan
So...thanks for reading this, but you're wrong on both your points.