Thank you for the article. I would share it if it did not contain photos of those doing the harm.
Request to progressive media:
Please do NOT use photos of 47, Musk, Miller, etc. as your featured image for every story. We've never shared their images in our feed, nor will we.
If you write about the harm they do, then feature the people they impact and who resist.
It takes a little more work and creativity to find other images, but it is worth it.
Yes, expose the coup that is underway and the fascist billionaires who are financing it. But you don't need to use their images (which they love to see) to illustrate every story.
I just checked the Supreme Court. Out of 116 justices since its founding there have been two Black men and six women. This amounts to roughly 7%, so that means that 93% have been White men.
I think the problem is not so much with your math but with your understanding of the sentence "94% of the U.S. Supreme Court is white men." Guy I am guessing understands that to mean today's US Supreme Court. I am sure you know that there are only 4 white men on the Supreme Court today. That would be 44%. I cannot interpret that sentence the way you do. Moreover, even if I could, I would not see the logic in doing so.
Interestingly, the statutes governing USAID have this section: 22 U.S. Code § 2151–2 - Actions to improve the international gender policy of the United States Agency for International Development (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2151-2). Read it. I can't help but wonder why this, rather than the end of South African Apartheid, is the reason the focus hit first on USAID.
Project 2025 proposes ELIMINATING the Dept of Education. It only proposes reorganizing USAID. It recognizes USAIDs value but disagrees with both the valueS in emphasizes and the way funds are distributed. It does attack DEI relentlessly--but doesn't mention the statute. It seems that it mostly wants to privatize all the users of the funds.
The GOP I'd so good at projecting. They claim that progressives are all about canceling culture. Look at them when they are in power; theybare tyrannical .
"Apparently, the new MAGA logic is that government cannot force a private entity to bake a cake for a gay wedding—because that's tyranny, but government can force a private entity to not bake a cake for a gay wedding—because that's freedom." Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds or logic!
"Banning DEIA Is About One Thing—Advancing White Supremacy"
Let's be clear - this is about advancing White MALE Supremacy. It kills me that white women are shooting themselves in the proverbial foot by supporting this. DEI initiatives *include white women*. These fools think by taking the villainous side, they'll be spared. If only there were some sort of historical records to warn them about the inevitable consequences. 🤔
In your opening, you said your source sent you a dozen memos. I think everyone would appreciate it if you could publish all of them, in full, or at least provide the precise titles, dates, etc. for each so anyone interested can FOIA for them and litigate to get them if necessary. If these memos went DoJ-wide, it seems you could release them without endangering your source. Thanks for what you've published so far.
Thank you for the article. I would share it if it did not contain photos of those doing the harm.
Request to progressive media:
Please do NOT use photos of 47, Musk, Miller, etc. as your featured image for every story. We've never shared their images in our feed, nor will we.
If you write about the harm they do, then feature the people they impact and who resist.
It takes a little more work and creativity to find other images, but it is worth it.
Yes, expose the coup that is underway and the fascist billionaires who are financing it. But you don't need to use their images (which they love to see) to illustrate every story.
Make the people visible instead.
Don't give hate free PR.
ZinnEdProject.org
Have they lost their tiny brains? How can she prosecute someone who is following the law?
See my take on Bondi's hypocrisy: https://davideroyphd.substack.com/p/the-hypocrisy-of-ag-pam-bondi-vs
Your math is incorrect on the Senate and Supreme Court demographics, minimally. Get it right if you’re gonna build a case.
I just checked the Supreme Court. Out of 116 justices since its founding there have been two Black men and six women. This amounts to roughly 7%, so that means that 93% have been White men.
If the math is incorrect, what are the accurate % and what is the source for these figures?
I think the problem is not so much with your math but with your understanding of the sentence "94% of the U.S. Supreme Court is white men." Guy I am guessing understands that to mean today's US Supreme Court. I am sure you know that there are only 4 white men on the Supreme Court today. That would be 44%. I cannot interpret that sentence the way you do. Moreover, even if I could, I would not see the logic in doing so.
She has zero business in this role. Just another puppet. This eclipses the Peter principle like never before.
https://youtu.be/OHjNrdnE9_c?si=YFmoVksIxpwACd1p
KKK
Interestingly, the statutes governing USAID have this section: 22 U.S. Code § 2151–2 - Actions to improve the international gender policy of the United States Agency for International Development (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/2151-2). Read it. I can't help but wonder why this, rather than the end of South African Apartheid, is the reason the focus hit first on USAID.
Project 2025 proposes ELIMINATING the Dept of Education. It only proposes reorganizing USAID. It recognizes USAIDs value but disagrees with both the valueS in emphasizes and the way funds are distributed. It does attack DEI relentlessly--but doesn't mention the statute. It seems that it mostly wants to privatize all the users of the funds.
The GOP I'd so good at projecting. They claim that progressives are all about canceling culture. Look at them when they are in power; theybare tyrannical .
LOVE this irony being pointed out!!
"Apparently, the new MAGA logic is that government cannot force a private entity to bake a cake for a gay wedding—because that's tyranny, but government can force a private entity to not bake a cake for a gay wedding—because that's freedom." Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds or logic!
Anyone surprised she ended up being full of shite and just as creepy as the rest?
"Banning DEIA Is About One Thing—Advancing White Supremacy"
Let's be clear - this is about advancing White MALE Supremacy. It kills me that white women are shooting themselves in the proverbial foot by supporting this. DEI initiatives *include white women*. These fools think by taking the villainous side, they'll be spared. If only there were some sort of historical records to warn them about the inevitable consequences. 🤔
Sounds illegal to me!! You can't tell companies who they can hire.
You will have to be very careful what you say around your neighbors, friends and relatives. They could be the next American Kapos. Trust know one.
Just a correction for type because j couldn’t find the EO straightaway. It is 14173.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02097/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity
In your opening, you said your source sent you a dozen memos. I think everyone would appreciate it if you could publish all of them, in full, or at least provide the precise titles, dates, etc. for each so anyone interested can FOIA for them and litigate to get them if necessary. If these memos went DoJ-wide, it seems you could release them without endangering your source. Thanks for what you've published so far.